7–10 However, no scoping review has been performed that provides a global picture of different strategies aiming to improve adherence to RGs. 12 13Īs mentioned, several reviews have analysed the quality of reporting in different clinical areas and for different study types. While some of these strategies have not been shown to have a benefit, 3 others report better but still suboptimal levels of reporting 5 6 or even clear benefits. For example, the effect of journal endorsement of RGs 3 5 6 and the implementation of writing aid tools for authors such as the CONSORT-based web tool (COBWEB) 12 have been assessed. In recent years, several initiatives aiming to improve adherence to RGs have been proposed, some of which have already been evaluated. Therefore, it is warranted to explore and develop strategies to improve the current levels of adherence to RGs. Although some studies reported acceptable overall levels of completeness of reporting and found that it had improved since the introduction of certain RGs such as CONSORT, the authors of most of the reviews (43 of 50, 86%) concluded that more improvement is needed or that adherence to RGs was inadequate, poor, medium or suboptimal. As they considered a broad range of clinical areas and study designs, their results provided a global picture of adherence to RGs in health research. 7–10 Samaan et al 11 went one step further and performed a systematic review of systematic reviews assessing adherence to RGs. 5 6ĭozens of systematic reviews have explored the extent of adherence to some RGs in certain areas of health research. The vast majority of RGs have not yet been assessed as to whether they help improve the reporting of research, 3 but some, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) for the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 4 have been shown to enhance the completeness of reporting. The most prominent of these changes has been the inception of reporting guidelines (RGs) for different study types, data and clinical areas. 1 The past two decades have given rise to a number of changes in an effort to help authors and the broader scientific community properly report research methods and findings, which would allow them to contribute to the broader goal of combating waste in biomedical research. Approximately 85% of all biomedical research today is estimated to be wasted, due, in part, to incomplete or inaccurate reporting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |